"Marxism in America" by Lt. Gen. (Ret.) W.G. Boykin - OAK

The Tea Party is a conservative movement. It isn't neo-conservative; but it does have libertarian leanings. Unlike libertarians, Conservatives are realists about the world and are rooted in history.

On the whole, the Tea Party won't support these positions - these will always be fringe positions because they are naive and dangerous positions. Which is one reason among many that Paul will never get more than 3% of the national vote.

 

That's one thing I'll prolly never understand.

 

Getting back to a gold standard (or some flavor of it) is naive, we are stuck with fiat money.

....

 

Sorry but I asked you to explain your statement that who he is and what he REALLY represents is "Shocking".

Making vague statements questioning his past, his associations, and his possible mental state then dismissing the possibility to question those statements is beyond lame.

Answering the original question as to why what he REALLY stands for is "Shocking" in YOUR opinion by listing off a few points that are NOT what he stands for but rather what some media outlets would have you believe tells me one of two things.

1. You don't know what Ron Paul REALLY stands for, probably because your listening to what others are saying about him instead of what HE has to say...
2. You don't care what Ron Paul REALLY stands for because you've already made up your mind that you need more government to better take care of you...

So for the time being, let's put aside your past, your questionable alliances, your wacko assertions, your obvious belief in socialism, and your unhealthy love for sheep.... and just answer the question of what about his REAL positions you think is shocking.

I'll even give you a little help by pointing out that I have already provided a link that explains his positions, backed up by a long and consistent history of voting and speaking in promotion of those ideals. Please tell me what about THOSE positions is shocking as I really don't have any interest in what is shocking about the misrepresentations perpetuated by mainstream media or those that chose to remain ignorant of the real facts.

 

.

Nice try WG! LOL!

Man, WG, you're still smarting from all the beatings I've given you?

That's kinda sad. You should just get over it.

_____

Kronos, I'll address your post when I get the time. Just wanted to say that I'll put together my takedown of Ron Paul anyway I want to; that's my perogative sir!

By the time I get to Paul's wacko/weirdo stuff (yes, there's lots of it my good man - I worked at CATO and was a libertarian for a long time, and I've been following him for a long time as well, and know quite a bit about him...unfortunately) - that is, when we first address the incoherence and outright silliness of his core positions, the wacko/weirdo stuff will just be icing on the cake. Fair 'nuff?

Btw, posting a wiki-link doesn't even come close to demonstrating the coherence or wisdom of Paul's positions. I'm sure you know that though.

Anyway, much more later.

Here's a piece to keep the conversation warm in the meantime: http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/no-we-shouldnt-take-ron-paul-more-seriously

~katz

 

Ground Zero Mosque organizers are trying to re-sell
their mosque in kinder, gentler language. But the facts
remain the same: millions of dollars are about to be pumped
into a major Muslim center and now organizers are using
the 9/11 tragedy to promote their efforts.

+ + Stand Against The Ground Zero Mosque

/

 

paul is our only hope, but he will be marginalized and if reaches office will be killed or caged and then all of he constitutionalists hopefuls will fade away for there is no one other.....in other words we are fooked

im moving to michigan and living under ground! yes i used the word and now my mouth feels dirty

 

Use of all drugs should be legal.
To expedite demise of drug addicts, currently illegal drugs may be given out freely, provided that there is enough private donations to support that effort.
To take care of uninsured and those in need;
Religious leaders should open shelters for those who need it, heavy emphasis on prayers, supported only by donations from general public.
Above should solve Afghans need to produce poppy, and Mexican gangsters will not need to take part in drugs distribution.

Every about 2-3 months, good size bomb should be dropped in proper place figured out by CIA, say, Tehran vicinity, Pyongyang vicinity, Caracas (??), and so on.

We need to keep military in good shape and standing.
We should not be proactive, sending them places.
When asked for military help, we should help only if they adopt our constitution and our way of life and language.
Otherwise there is little difference between flavors of oppressive governments, so we just pray for them.
Upkeep of military is expensive, whoever ask for help, should expect to pay for it.


....

 

There are reserved places in Netherlands, Germany and Switzerland where drug addicted are free to use their drugs or even supplied with them along with all the necessary. Then drug addicted are happy to go in these places because they are safe and assisted with everything. Doing so these countries have reduced much the social impact and criminality linked to drug production and abuse.

 

I am sure that life of drug addicts is not easy.
We need similar program in USA.

Problem is that in places you describe the cost is most likely contained and minimal.
In USA everything have to mushroom into trillions.

Feel free to add more details and descriptions on how all this is working.


..

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=tCAffMSWSzY#t=28

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=tCAffMSWSzY#t=28

It works but misses first 28 seconds.
They can be heard by using mouse pointer and sliding indicator to time zero.


........

 

Thanks very much.

 

thank u very much

 

thanks for sharing